CharXiv Reasoning
A scientific chart reasoning benchmark that tests whether models can understand, interpret, and reason about complex scientific visualizations including plots, diagrams, and data charts.
42 models
Higher is better.
- 1Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba93.5
- 2Claude Mythos 5Anthropic93.5
- 3Qwen3.8-Omni-FlashAlibaba91.4
- 4Kimi K3Moonshot AI91.3
- 5Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Anthropic91.0
- 6Qwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba90.6
- 7Qwen3.8-27BAlibaba90.2
- 8Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic89.9
- 9GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AI89.4
- 10Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle88.7
- 11Muse Spark 1.1Meta88.4
- 12Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic88.3
- 13Muse SparkMeta86.4
- 14Qwen3.7 PlusAlibaba85.9
- 15Seed 2.1 ProByteDance85.4
- 16Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle84.2
- 17GPT-5.4OpenAI82.8
- 18MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax82.5
- 19GPT-5.2OpenAI82.1
- 20InklingThinking Machines Lab82.0
- 21Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba81.5
- 22Gemini 3 ProGoogle81.4
- 23Inkling-SmallThinking Machines Lab81.3
- 24MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi81.0
- 25Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12BNVIDIA80.8
- 26Qwen3.5 397BAlibaba80.8
- 27Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI80.4
- 28Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle80.2
- 29Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba79.5
- 30Muse Glimmer 30BMeta78.8
- 31Qwen3.6-27BAlibaba78.4
- 32Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba78.0
- 33Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Moonshot AI77.5
- 34Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI77.5
- 35Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba77.5
- 36Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic77.4
- 37Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba77.2
- 38Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNVIDIA76.3
- 39Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle73.2
- 40Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic68.5
About this benchmark
- Metric
- Chart understanding and reasoning
- Tasks
- Scientific chart reasoning
- Authors
- CharXiv authors (2024)
Scores are as reported by model developers or evaluators and may use different settings (for example reasoning effort or tools). Compare with care.
All results
| 1 | Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba | 93.5 |
| 2 | Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic | 93.5 |
| 3 | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash Alibaba | 91.4 |
| 4 | Kimi K3 Moonshot AI | 91.3 |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) Anthropic | 91.0 |
| 6 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Alibaba | 90.6 |
| 7 | Qwen3.8-27B Alibaba | 90.2 |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic | 89.9 |
| 9 | GLM-5.3-Flash Z.AI | 89.4 |
| 10 | Gemini 3.7 Flash Google | 88.7 |
| 11 | Muse Spark 1.1 Meta | 88.4 |
| 12 | Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic | 88.3 |
| 13 | Muse Spark Meta | 86.4 |
| 14 | Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba | 85.9 |
| 15 | Seed 2.1 Pro ByteDance | 85.4 |
| 16 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Google | 84.2 |
| 17 | GPT-5.4 OpenAI | 82.8 |
| 18 | MiniMax M3.1 Flash MiniMax | 82.5 |
| 19 | GPT-5.2 OpenAI | 82.1 |
| 20 | Inkling Thinking Machines Lab | 82.0 |
| 21 | Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba | 81.5 |
| 22 | Gemini 3 Pro Google | 81.4 |
| 23 | Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab | 81.3 |
| 24 | MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi | 81.0 |
| 25 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVIDIA | 80.8 |
| 26 | Qwen3.5 397B Alibaba | 80.8 |
| 27 | Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI | 80.4 |
| 28 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Google | 80.2 |
| 29 | Qwen3.5-27B Alibaba | 79.5 |
| 30 | Muse Glimmer 30B Meta | 78.8 |
| 31 | Qwen3.6-27B Alibaba | 78.4 |
| 32 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Alibaba | 78.0 |
| 33 | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) Moonshot AI | 77.5 |
| 34 | Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI | 77.5 |
| 35 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Alibaba | 77.5 |
| 36 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic | 77.4 |
| 37 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Alibaba | 77.2 |
| 38 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B NVIDIA | 76.3 |
| 39 | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Google | 73.2 |
| 40 | Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic | 68.5 |
| 41 | Grok 4.20 xAI | 60.9 |
| 42 | Command A+ Cohere | 52.7 |