Gert Labs Composite Game Benchmark
A game-environment benchmark that evaluates AI models in novel games covering strategic planning, resource management, spatial reasoning, cooperation, and theory of mind.
52 models
Higher is better.
- 1Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic72.97
- 2GPT-5.5OpenAI72.93
- 3Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic65.59
- 4GPT-5.4OpenAI64.89
- 5Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba64.27
- 6Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic64.23
- 7Gemini 3 ProGoogle63.23
- 8Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic62.92
- 9MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi62.70
- 10Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic61.85
- 11Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle61.85
- 12GLM-5.1Z.AI60.11
- 13GPT-5.3 CodexOpenAI57.47
- 14Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle56.87
- 15Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI56.82
- 16Gemini 3 FlashGoogle56.63
- 17Qwen3.6-27BAlibaba54.84
- 18GPT-5.2-CodexOpenAI51.79
- 19Step 3.7 FlashStepFun51.57
- 20GLM-5Z.AI50.99
- 21Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba50.60
- 22GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI49.68
- 23Grok Build 0.1xAI49.15
- 24Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic48.51
- 25Grok 4.1 FastxAI47.32
- 26MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi46.89
- 27Qwen3.5 397BAlibaba46.76
- 28GPT-5.2OpenAI46.54
- 29Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI45.88
- 30Grok 4.3xAI43.86
- 31Qwen3 MaxAlibaba43.74
- 32Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba42.65
- 33Grok 4xAI42.34
- 34Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle42.01
- 35GPT-5.1OpenAI41.24
- 36MiniMax M2.7MiniMax40.40
- 37GLM-4.7Z.AI39.95
- 38Claude 4 SonnetAnthropic39.66
- 39Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba39.41
- 40Mistral Medium 3.5 128BMistral39.10
About this benchmark
- Metric
- Composite game leaderboard
- Tasks
- Novel game environments
- Authors
- Gert Labs (2026)
- Source
- Gert Labs rankings ↗
Scores are as reported by model developers or evaluators and may use different settings (for example reasoning effort or tools). Compare with care.
All results
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic | 72.97 |
| 2 | GPT-5.5 OpenAI | 72.93 |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic | 65.59 |
| 4 | GPT-5.4 OpenAI | 64.89 |
| 5 | Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba | 64.27 |
| 6 | Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic | 64.23 |
| 7 | Gemini 3 Pro Google | 63.23 |
| 8 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic | 62.92 |
| 9 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi | 62.70 |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic | 61.85 |
| 11 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Google | 61.85 |
| 12 | GLM-5.1 Z.AI | 60.11 |
| 13 | GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI | 57.47 |
| 14 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Google | 56.87 |
| 15 | Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI | 56.82 |
| 16 | Gemini 3 Flash Google | 56.63 |
| 17 | Qwen3.6-27B Alibaba | 54.84 |
| 18 | GPT-5.2-Codex OpenAI | 51.79 |
| 19 | Step 3.7 Flash StepFun | 51.57 |
| 20 | GLM-5 Z.AI | 50.99 |
| 21 | Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba | 50.60 |
| 22 | GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI | 49.68 |
| 23 | Grok Build 0.1 xAI | 49.15 |
| 24 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic | 48.51 |
| 25 | Grok 4.1 Fast xAI | 47.32 |
| 26 | MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi | 46.89 |
| 27 | Qwen3.5 397B Alibaba | 46.76 |
| 28 | GPT-5.2 OpenAI | 46.54 |
| 29 | Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI | 45.88 |
| 30 | Grok 4.3 xAI | 43.86 |
| 31 | Qwen3 Max Alibaba | 43.74 |
| 32 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Alibaba | 42.65 |
| 33 | Grok 4 xAI | 42.34 |
| 34 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Google | 42.01 |
| 35 | GPT-5.1 OpenAI | 41.24 |
| 36 | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax | 40.40 |
| 37 | GLM-4.7 Z.AI | 39.95 |
| 38 | Claude 4 Sonnet Anthropic | 39.66 |
| 39 | Qwen3.5-27B Alibaba | 39.41 |
| 40 | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Mistral | 39.10 |
| 41 | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Google | 38.46 |
| 42 | Grok 4.20 xAI | 38.36 |
| 43 | Hy3 Preview Tencent | 36.91 |
| 44 | MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi | 36.68 |
| 45 | Gemma 4 31B Google | 35.26 |
| 46 | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) Moonshot AI | 32.58 |
| 47 | Trinity-Large-Thinking Arcee AI | 32.55 |
| 48 | GLM-5V-Turbo Z.AI | 30.76 |
| 49 | GPT-OSS 120B OpenAI | 29.61 |
| 50 | DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek | 29.57 |
| 51 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Alibaba | 28.96 |
| 52 | GPT-4.1 OpenAI | 25.65 |